A word mark protects your brand name as text, in any font or colour; a device mark protects your logo or graphic; and a combined mark protects the name and logo locked together as one design. In Nepal you file each with the Department of Industry, and the type you choose decides how broad your protection is. For most brands, filing the word and the logo separately gives the strongest cover.
Key Takeaways
- A word mark protects the brand name itself, regardless of styling — the broadest protection for a name.
- A device mark protects a logo or graphic element — the visual, not the words.
- A combined mark protects the specific name-plus-logo lockup, but more narrowly on each element.
- Word marks must be distinctive as text; a descriptive name is hard to register as a word mark.
- For the strongest cover, file the word mark and the device mark separately.
- All types are registered with the Department of Industry under the Patent, Design and Trademark Act 1965.
What is a word mark?
A word mark protects the text of your brand name itself — the letters and words, independent of any font, colour or logo. It is the broadest protection for a name: register "BRAND" as a word mark and you can stop others using that name whatever styling they apply. The trade-off is that the name must be distinctive as text, so a descriptive term is hard to register this way. This is the mark most businesses should prioritise. See what can be trademarked.
What is a device mark?
A device mark protects a logo, symbol or graphic — the visual element, not the words. If your brand is recognised by a distinctive icon or emblem, a device mark stops others copying that image. It does not, on its own, protect the brand name as text, so a competitor could use a similar name with a different logo. Learn more in registering a logo as a trademark and logo registration in Nepal.
What is a combined mark?
A combined mark (also called a composite or logo-with-text mark) protects the name and logo together as a single locked design. It reflects exactly how your brand appears in the real world, which feels natural — but the protection attaches to the combination. Change the logo and the name may be less protected on its own; change the name and the logo may be too. That specificity is why a combined mark alone can leave gaps.
Which gives the broadest protection?
The word mark gives the broadest protection for a name, because it covers the words in any visual form, while a device or combined mark is tied to a specific image. That is why the strongest strategy for most brands is to file two applications — the word mark for the name and a device mark for the logo — rather than relying on one combined mark. You then own each element independently and can enforce either against a copycat.
Word mark vs device mark vs combined mark: side by side
| Type | Protects | Strength | Best when |
|---|---|---|---|
| Word mark | The brand name as text | Broadest for the name | The name is distinctive and central |
| Device mark | The logo or graphic | Protects the visual only | A distinctive icon carries the brand |
| Combined mark | Name + logo locked together | Narrowest per element | Budget for one filing; fixed lockup |
Which should you file?
Choose by what carries your brand and what you can protect. If the name is distinctive, file the word mark first — it is the most valuable. Add a device mark for the logo if the visual is important. File a combined mark only if budget forces a single filing, or the name is too descriptive to register alone and the logo adds the distinctiveness needed to pass examination. When in doubt, word plus device beats combined.
- Distinctive name, simple logo → word mark (add device later).
- Iconic logo, generic name → device mark, and improve the name.
- Descriptive name that won't register alone → combined mark so the logo carries distinctiveness.
- Established brand, real budget → both word and device, filed separately.
Does the class still matter?
Yes — whichever type you file, it still applies only to the NICE class(es) you register, because a trademark protects specific goods or services, not the mark in the abstract. So a word mark in one class does not automatically cover unrelated goods in another. Get the type and the class right together. Read what is NICE classification and check conflicts with our Conflict Checker.
A real example: how the choice plays out
Picture a Kathmandu coffee roaster called "Himal Roast" with a distinctive mountain icon. If it files only a combined mark — the words and the mountain locked together — a competitor could open "Himal Roast" cafés using a plain wordmark or a different logo, and the roaster's protection on the name alone would be weak. File the word mark "Himal Roast" and the roaster can stop that name whatever logo sits beside it. Add a device mark for the mountain icon and the visual is protected too, even if a copycat pairs it with a different name. Two focused filings close both doors; one combined filing leaves a gap at each.
Common mistakes to avoid
- Filing only a combined mark to save money. It feels complete but protects each element narrowly — the most common gap we see.
- Registering a stylised logo but never the name. A device mark won't stop a similar name in plain text.
- Choosing a descriptive name and expecting a word mark. Descriptive terms struggle to register as word marks; add distinctiveness or lean on a device.
- Forgetting the class. The type of mark doesn't widen the goods and services — the NICE class still sets the boundary. See choosing the right class.
- Assuming colour is protected by a word mark. If a specific colourway matters, protect it with a device or combined mark.
People also search for
- How to register a logo as a trademark in Nepal
- What can be trademarked in Nepal?
- What is a trademark?
- What counts as a confusingly similar trademark?
- How to register a trademark in Nepal
- What is NICE classification?
File the right mark for your brand
Not sure whether to file the name, the logo, or both? Check your brand free with the Conflict Checker or search the register, then file with our team — we advise on word versus device versus combined, word the specification, and file with the Department of Industry. Talk to an IP expert to get the strategy right the first time.






Comments (0)
Leave a comment
Replying to — cancel