Choose a name that does one legal job: it must distinguish your goods or services from everyone else's. That is the whole test in Nepal's Act. Clear it, avoid the four grounds the Department of Industry (DoI) can refuse on, and you have a name worth filing.

Key takeaways

  • The word distinguish appears exactly once in the Act — in Sec. 2(c), the definition of a trade mark. That is the core test.
  • "Distinctive", "descriptive" and "generic" appear nowhere in the Act. Those rules come from examination practice, not statute.
  • Sec. 18(1) gives four express refusal grounds, and all four are about harm or conflict rather than wordcraft.
  • Common words are crowded here: 1,231 published marks contain "gold" and 657 contain "Nepal".
  • A name registered at the Company Registrar is not a trademark, and a domain is not one either.
  • Nepal is first-to-file, so a strong name is only yours once an application is in.

What does Nepali law actually require of a brand name?

Very little on its face, and a great deal in practice. Sec. 2(c) of the Patent, Design and Trade Mark Act 1965 defines a trade mark as a word, symbol or picture, or a combination of them, used by a firm, company or individual on its products or services to distinguish them from the products or services of others.

That single clause carries the whole burden. If your name cannot tell buyers that this product is yours rather than anyone else's, it is not performing the function the definition describes.

Everything a trademark examiner says about weak names traces back to that sentence. It is worth reading twice before you commit to a shortlist.

Not in the words of the Act. Read the consolidated text on the Nepal Law Commission site and search it: "distinctive", "descriptive" and "generic" each appear zero times.

What the Act gives you instead is the definition in Sec. 2(c) and an examination step. Sec. 18(1) requires the Department to make necessary investigation, give the applicant a proper chance to defend the application, and register the mark if it finds it appropriate to do so.

So a purely descriptive name is refused because it fails the definition, not because a section bans descriptiveness. The practical result is the same, but knowing the route matters when you are arguing a borderline name.

Which names does the Act expressly bar?

The proviso to Sec. 18(1) is short and specific. The Department shall not register a mark where it may hurt the prestige of any individual or institution, where it adversely affects public conduct or morality, where it undermines the national interest or the reputation of another person's trade mark, or where the mark is already registered in another person's name.

Three of those four are about harm. Only the last is about someone else having got there first, and that is the one a search can answer for you in advance.

Four gates every name must passA proposed name passes through four gates drawn from the proviso to section 18 of the Act: it must not hurt anyone's prestige, must not offend public conduct or morality, must not undermine the national interest or another mark's reputation, and must not already be registered to someone else.Your proposed name1It does not hurt the prestige of a person or institution2It does not offend public conduct or morality3It does not undermine the national interest or another mark4It is not already registered to someone else
The four express grounds in the proviso to Sec. 18(1). A search answers the fourth; judgement and advice answer the first three.

Why do common words make weak brand names here?

Because hundreds of businesses have already reached for them. A name built from praise words and places is hard to distinguish, hard to clear and hard to defend once registered.

The published record makes the point better than any argument. In IP Sewa's archive of more than 71,500 published marks, 1,231 contain "gold", 657 contain "Nepal", 616 contain "premium" and 526 contain "super".

How crowded the obvious words areSix bars counting published marks containing a word: gold appears in 1,231 marks, Nepal in 657, premium in 616, super in 526, royal in 363 and Himalayan in 258.Published marks containing the wordgold1,231Nepal657premium616super526royal363Himalayan258Published bulletin entries in IP Sewa's archive, September 2026
Every one of these words puts your name among hundreds of near neighbours, which makes both clearance and enforcement harder.

What does a strong name look like?

Strength runs along a scale. At one end sits the plain name of the product, which belongs to everybody. At the other sits a word nobody has used before, which can only mean you.

Invented and arbitrary names cost more in marketing because you have to teach them. They cost far less in law, because they distinguish from the first day and leave no room for a competitor to argue the word was simply ordinary.

The strength scale for a brand nameFive bands from weakest to strongest: generic such as Dairy, descriptive such as Fresh Dairy, suggestive such as Peakfit, arbitrary such as Monsoon Paints, and invented such as Kavira. An arrow below runs from harder to register to easiest to defend.Weak to strong, left to rightGenericDairynever yoursDescriptiveFresh Dairyhard goingSuggestivePeakfitusually fineArbitraryMonsoon PaintsstrongInventedKavirastrongestHarder to teach customers, far easier to defend.
Names on the left are cheap to explain and expensive to protect. The trade is real, and it is worth making deliberately.

Does a company name at the Registrar protect the brand?

No. Registering a company name creates a corporate entity. It does not create a trade mark, and the two registers are run by different bodies with different tests.

Plenty of Nepali businesses discover this late, after a competitor registers the same word as a mark. We set out the difference in our guide to trademarks versus trade names and company names.

Three registrations, three different rightsCard one: a company name registration creates the entity and stops an identical company name, but gives no brand right. Card two: a domain registration gives you the web address only, for as long as you renew it. Card three: a trade mark registration gives exclusive brand rights in its class and can be enforced.Three registrations, three different rightsCompany nameCreates the entityBlocks the samecompany nameNo brand rightNot a trade markDomain nameGives the addressLasts while youkeep renewing itNo brand rightNot a trade markTrade markExclusive in its classRenewable inseven-year termsCan be enforcedThe brand right
Most new businesses secure the first two and assume the third follows. It does not, and the gap is where disputes start.

Can you trademark a personal name, a place or a number?

Sometimes, and the answer turns on the same test. A surname used as a brand can distinguish if the public reads it as a badge of origin rather than as a description of who happens to run the shop.

Place names are harder. A name that simply says where the goods come from struggles to distinguish, and in Nepal it also lands in a very crowded field. Numbers and letters sit at the weak end unless they are presented distinctively.

Type of nameExampleHow it usually fares
Invented wordKaviraStrongest. Nothing to argue about.
Ordinary word, unrelated goodsMonsoon PaintsStrong, and easy to clear.
Hint at a qualityPeakfit for trekking gearUsually acceptable.
Plain descriptionFresh Dairy for milkWeak, and often queried.
Place name aloneA district name on local goodsWeak and heavily crowded.
The product itselfDairy for milkNot registrable as a brand.

How do you test a shortlist before you fall in love with one?

Test five candidates, not one. The point of a shortlist is to lose names cheaply, so run every candidate through the same sequence and keep notes on why each one fell away.

  1. Say what the name means. If the explanation is just the product, move it down the list.
  2. Pick the class first. Registrability is judged against the goods, so use the NICE class finder before testing anything.
  3. Search the published record. Run each candidate through the trademark database of published marks.
  4. Test near misses. The conflict checker surfaces similar spellings and sound-alikes, not just exact matches.
  5. Read the four gates. Ask honestly whether anyone could call the name offensive or insulting to an institution.
  6. Keep two survivors. Examination can still go against you, and a reserve name saves a relaunch.

If you are generating options rather than testing them, our brand-name generator is a quick way to get past the obvious words. More on the availability half of this in our guide to checking name availability in Nepal.

Does the class change whether a name is registrable?

Yes, decisively. A word is only descriptive in relation to something. "Monsoon" describes very little about paint and quite a lot about an umbrella.

That is why class and name must be decided together. The same word can be strong in one class and unregistrable in another, so testing a name without a class produces an answer you cannot rely on. Our guide to choosing the right trademark class covers the class side.

Can a logo rescue a weak word?

Partly, and the rescue is narrower than people hope. Filing the word inside a distinctive device can get a composite mark through, but what you then own leans on the artwork.

A competitor using the same plain word with different styling may fall outside it. If the word itself is the asset, the word itself is what needs to be registrable.

What about Nepali and Devanagari names?

A Nepali-script name can be registered, and the Act's definition does not limit a mark to any script. Practically, a brand used in both scripts is often filed in both forms so neither version is left open.

Translation matters too. A word that is invented in English may be an everyday noun in Nepali, which moves it straight to the weak end of the scale for Nepali-speaking customers.

Does the ™ symbol help while you wait?

It has no legal standing here. The symbol is not mentioned in the Act, and Sec. 18B goes further: no trade mark may be used as a registered trade mark without registering it at the Department of Industry. Sec. 19 backs that with a fine and confiscation of the goods connected with the offence.

So do not describe an unregistered name as registered, in packaging or advertising. Filing early is the real protection, as the Department of Industry process assumes.

Sec. 16(1) puts it plainly: title to a trade mark is acquired upon registration with the Department. Until then you hold a name you are using, not a right you can enforce as a registered mark.

What happens after you pick the name?

You file, and the name enters a public process. After examination the Department publishes accepted marks in the Industrial Property Bulletin, which opens the opposition window in which an earlier owner can object.

If nothing lands, a registration certificate follows and the mark runs for a seven-year renewal term, renewable in further seven-year terms. Foreign applicants reach the same point through a Nepali agent appointed by power of attorney.

The whole sequence is commonly described as about 12–14 months end to end when unopposed, and 6–8 months only in the smoothest cases. Sec. 18A also means a brand trading in several classes files several applications, each running its own course.

Because Nepal sits outside the international trademark filing systems administered by WIPO, a mark registered abroad does not carry into Nepal. The national filing is the only route.

What are the common mistakes when choosing a brand name?

Nearly all of them come from choosing the name first and asking the legal question last, once signage, packaging and a domain already exist.

  • Picking a name that describes the product and hoping the examiner is generous.
  • Treating the Company Registrar entry, or a business-name registration, as brand protection.
  • Reaching for "gold", "premium" or "royal" in a field that already holds hundreds of them.
  • Testing the name without first deciding the class it will be judged in.
  • Checking exact spellings only, and missing the sound-alikes that actually cause refusals.
  • Printing the registered-mark claim before any application exists, contrary to Sec. 18B.

What does an undefendable name cost? An example

Imagine a Bhaktapur workshop selling handwoven blankets under the name "Premium Himalayan Wool". It reads well on a label and the owners register the company under it. This is an illustration, not a real case.

Two years in, three competitors use almost the same phrase. Nothing in it points to this workshop rather than any other, so there is no strong argument to make, and an application faces a field already thick with similar words.

A short invented name, filed in the right class on day one, would have cost the same to register and left something worth defending. The difference was decided at the naming meeting, not at the Department.

In short

Pick a name that could only mean you, check it against the four grounds in Sec. 18(1), decide the class, then search before you print anything. A name that distinguishes is the one asset in this process you control completely.

If you want the shortlist tested properly, our search and clearance service delivers a written opinion on each candidate, and our registration service takes the survivor through to certificate.

People also search for

Have two or three names and no idea which will survive examination? Contact our team with the shortlist and the goods you sell, and we will tell you which one is worth filing before you spend anything on packaging.

Share