A trademark examination report in Nepal is an official notice from the Department of Industry (DoI) that raises objections to your trademark application — usually on grounds of similarity to an existing mark, lack of distinctiveness, or a formal defect. You must file a written reply within 35 days of receiving the report, or the application will be abandoned.
Key Takeaways
- An examination report is not a final rejection — it is the DoI giving you a chance to argue your case or fix a problem before a decision is made.
- You get 35 days to respond in writing; missing that window abandons the application and you lose your filing date.
- The most common objections are similarity to a registered mark, the mark being descriptive, or missing documents like a notarised Power of Attorney.
- If the DoI accepts your reply, the mark proceeds to publication in the Industrial Property Bulletin for the 90-day opposition window.
- Having a local agent or IP consultant handle the reply is critical — arguments must reference Nepali law and DoI practice, not generic principles.
- The report is part of the standard 12–14 month registration timeline; a well-handled reply keeps you on track.
- You can search the DoI trademark database yourself at any time to understand what marks are already on the register — our trademark search tool makes that straightforward.
What exactly is a trademark examination report in Nepal?
A trademark examination report is a formal notice issued by the Department of Industry under the Patent, Design and Trademark Act 1965 after it reviews your application. It tells you the examiner has found one or more problems that prevent registration as filed. Think of it as a "please explain" letter — not a refusal. You get a single opportunity to respond within 35 days, and the quality of that reply often decides whether your mark proceeds to publication in the Industrial Property Bulletin or gets abandoned.
Why does the DoI issue an examination report?
The DoI examines every trademark application to check it meets the standards in Sec. 18 of the Act. If the examiner finds a conflict — similarity to an earlier registered mark, a mark that describes the goods rather than distinguishes them, or paperwork that is incomplete — they must give you a chance to be heard before refusing. That obligation to hear the applicant is a basic principle of administrative law, and the examination report is the mechanism for it. The report also helps keep the register clean by blocking marks that would confuse the public.
What are the most common objections in a Nepal examination report?
In practice, most examination reports from the DoI raise one or more of these objections. Knowing them ahead of filing can help you avoid the report entirely.
| Objection type | What it means | Typical fix |
|---|---|---|
| Similarity to a registered mark | The examiner thinks your mark looks, sounds or means the same as one already on the register for related goods or services. | Argue differences in appearance, sound, meaning, or class of goods; provide evidence of distinctiveness. |
| Lack of distinctiveness | Your mark describes the product itself (e.g. "Fresh Bread" for a bakery) or is a common trade term — it does not distinguish your goods from others'. | Show acquired distinctiveness through long use and promotion in Nepal, or amend to a more distinctive form. |
| Scandalous or contrary to public morality | The mark contains words or imagery that hurt the prestige of an individual or institution, or offend public conduct or national interest (Sec. 18 proviso). | Amend or abandon the mark; this is hard to overcome unless the examiner's reading is clearly unreasonable. |
| Formal or documentary defect | Missing notarised Power of Attorney, board resolution, label specimen, or incorrect class description. | Submit the missing document or correct the filing — usually straightforward. |
| Wrong classification | You filed in a NICE class that does not match your goods or services, or filed one application covering multiple classes. | Amend the class or split into separate applications (one per class, as Nepal requires). |
A common mistake we see is applicants treating the report as a formality and sending a one-paragraph reply. The DoI examiner needs a reasoned, evidence-backed response that engages with the specific grounds raised. Our team can help you prepare that reply — reach out here if you have received a report and are unsure how to respond.
How do you respond to a trademark examination report in Nepal?
Responding is a structured legal exercise, not a casual email. Follow these steps carefully. The 35-day clock starts when you receive the report, not when it was issued, but do not wait until day 34.
- Read every objection carefully. The report will list one or more grounds under the Act. Highlight the key legal basis and the factual claim (e.g. "your mark is similar to registration no. 12345 in class 30").
- Gather evidence. If the objection is similarity, you will need a side-by-side comparison of the marks — look at appearance, sound, meaning, and the goods/services. Screenshots of how the marks appear in the market, proof of your use in Nepal, and any consumer survey data can help. If the objection is descriptiveness, gather evidence of how long and how widely you have used the mark.
- Draft the reply as a formal legal submission. Address each objection point by point. Cite the relevant sections of the Act, refer to the DoI's own practice where helpful, and argue concretely — not "our mark is different," but "our mark differs in its dominant element X, while the cited mark is dominated by Y, making visual and phonetic confusion unlikely."
- Attach supporting documents. Include a fresh label specimen if needed, a board resolution if one was missing, or the notarised Power of Attorney if it was defective.
- File the reply with the DoI. Submit it at the Department of Industry, typically through your authorised agent or representative. Keep a stamped acknowledgment as proof of timely filing.
What happens if you miss the 35-day deadline?
Missing the 35-day window is fatal — the DoI treats the application as abandoned and you lose your priority date. There is no automatic extension or grace period for responding to an examination report in Nepal. If you later want protection, you must file a fresh application and start the 12–14 month process all over again. That new application will carry a later filing date, which means any mark that registered in the meantime could block yours. The best defence is to monitor your application status and act the moment a report arrives. If you are not sure where your application stands, use our application number lookup tool to check.
What legal provisions govern the examination report?
The examination report process draws on several sections of the Patent, Design and Trademark Act 1965. Sec. 18(1) gives the DoI the power to examine and inquire before registering a mark. The proviso to that section lists the grounds for refusal — hurting prestige or reputation, adverse effect on public conduct or morality, damaging another's goodwill, or being already registered. Sec. 18A requires classification under the NICE system and mandates one application per class. Together, these form the legal basis for every objection you will see in a report. Nepal follows a first-to-file system, so the examiner compares your mark against earlier filing dates, not who used it first in the market.
How does the examination report fit into the larger registration timeline?
Filing your application kicks off a process that typically takes 12–14 months from start to certificate. The examination happens early — usually within the first 2–4 months. If the examiner finds no issues, the mark goes straight to publication in the Industrial Property Bulletin, where third parties have 90 days to oppose. If a report is issued, those 35 days you spend replying add to the timeline, as does any back-and-forth if the DoI is not satisfied with your first response. A well-prepared reply that resolves all objections cleanly keeps you close to that 12–14 month track. A weak reply that triggers further queries can push the process well past 18 months.
A realistic Nepal example — how a restaurant chain handled a similarity objection
Imagine a Kathmandu-based restaurant chain, "Yeti Kitchen," that applied to register its logo as a trademark in NICE class 43 for restaurant services. The DoI examiner issued a report objecting that the word "Yeti" was too similar to an earlier registered mark "Yeti Foods" in class 30 for packaged snacks. The applicant's reply argued that class 43 (restaurant services) and class 30 (packaged food products) serve different channels of trade, the marks are visually distinct — one is a stylised logo with a mountain graphic, the other a plain word mark — and "Yeti" is a widely used cultural reference in Nepal that no single business can monopolise across all classes. The DoI accepted the reply, and the mark proceeded to publication. That reply succeeded because it was specific, evidence-backed, and engaged with the NICE class distinction that matters under Nepali practice. A generic "our mark is different" letter would not have worked.
How do you avoid an examination report in the first place?
The single most effective step is a thorough trademark search before you file. Searching the DoI database for identical and similar marks in your class — and in related classes — lets you spot conflicts early and adjust your mark or strategy. Our trademark search tool connects directly to the DoI database and lets you search by word, owner, or application number. For class-specific searches, try our search-by-NICE-class tool. Filing in the correct NICE class from day one also prevents a classification objection — Nepal requires one application per class, so a mark covering restaurants (class 43) and packaged goods (class 30) needs two separate applications. Getting the class right at filing avoids a report that asks you to amend or split your application later.
In short
A trademark examination report is not the end of the road — it is a standard part of the DoI's process and a chance to defend your mark. But it is also a tight deadline with real legal stakes. The 35-day window is absolute, and a weak reply wastes the filing fee and your priority date. The best approach: search before you file to avoid objections where you can, and get professional help with the reply when a report does arrive.
If you have received an examination report and need help preparing the reply, contact our team. You can also order a professional trademark search before filing to reduce the chance of an objection in the first place.
People also search for:
- How to register a trademark in Nepal — the full process
- How long does trademark registration take in Nepal?
- Documents required for trademark registration in Nepal
- How to choose the right trademark class in Nepal
- What is the NICE classification for trademarks?
- How much does trademark registration cost in Nepal?
- Frequently asked questions about trademarks in Nepal






Comments (0)
Leave a comment
Replying to — cancel